Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2679a ============================ Appeal 2679a ============================ Panelist: Murphy Decision: REMAND Panelist: c. Decision: REMAND Panelist: Pavitra Decision: REMAND Panelist: BobTHJ Decision: REMAND Panelist: Walker Decision: REMAND ======================================================================== History: Appeal initiated: 16 Sep 2009 16:16:29 GMT Assigned to Murphy (panelist): 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT Assigned to c. (panelist): 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT Assigned to Pavitra (panelist): 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT Assigned to BobTHJ (panelist): 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT Assigned to Walker (panelist): 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT Murphy moves to REMAND: 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT c. moves to REMAND: 26 Sep 2009 19:55:25 GMT Walker moves to REMAND: 27 Sep 2009 09:05:17 GMT BobTHJ moves to REMAND: 28 Sep 2009 15:01:26 GMT Pavitra moves to REMAND: 30 Sep 2009 22:20:00 GMT Final decision (REMAND): 30 Sep 2009 22:20:00 GMT ======================================================================== Appellant Murphy's Arguments: I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that the transfer failed, but the statement is "ais523 owns a Dunce Cap card" which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN, as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as "ais523 transferred a Dunce Cap card" or something similar. ======================================================================== Appellant coppro's Arguments: I support and do so, as I misread the statement. I recommend REMAND. ======================================================================== Panelist Pavitra's Arguments: [no opinion given] ========================================================================