Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2689a

============================  Appeal 2689a  ============================

Panelist:                               Pavitra
Decision:                               REMAND

Panelist:                               coppro
Decision:                               REMAND

Panelist:                               BobTHJ
Decision:                               REMAND

========================================================================

History:

Appeal initiated:                       20 Sep 2009 17:20:24 GMT
Assigned to Pavitra (panelist):         23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT
Assigned to coppro (panelist):          23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT
Assigned to BobTHJ (panelist):          23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT
coppro moves to REMAND:                 23 Sep 2009 22:26:26 GMT
BobTHJ moves to REMAND:                 23 Sep 2009 22:26:59 GMT
Pavitra moves to REMAND:                24 Sep 2009 03:19:30 GMT
Final decision (REMAND):                24 Sep 2009 03:19:30 GMT

========================================================================

Appellant coppro's Arguments:

I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this case, as the judgment does not 
seem to concur with the arguments. I recommend REMAND.

========================================================================

Appellant Walker's Arguments:

ah, dammit. coppro is right, I meant FALSE. I support.

========================================================================