Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2700

===================  CFJ 2700 (Interest Index = 0)  ====================

    ais523 has amended the Fantasy Rules Contest contract within the
    past 24 hours.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 Murphy
Barred:                                 ais523

Judge:                                  Tiger
Judgement:                              

========================================================================

History:

Called by Murphy:                       19 Sep 2009 21:59:11 GMT
Assigned to ə:                         23 Sep 2009 22:32:33 GMT
ə recused:                             12 Oct 2009 23:41:14 GMT
Assigned to BobTHJ:                     13 Oct 2009 00:06:21 GMT
BobTHJ recused:                         14 Oct 2009 03:18:00 GMT
Assigned to Tiger:                      14 Oct 2009 17:58:57 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

ais523 wrote:

> The argument basically goes like this: if "without member objection" is
> a dependent action, then Agora is Satisfied with it, no matter how many
> people purported to object. (It fulfils (1), (2), /and/ (3) of rule
> 2124; because the action isn't without objections, with supporters, or
> with Agoran consent, all three parts of the rules are met.) And
> therefore, such a phrasing, clearly intended (according to the arguments
> that people are pouring into a-b and a-d) to be a dependent action, is
> (even though no rule says it is), and I can do it if Agora is satisfied.
> Agora is satisified, therefore I can do it.
> 
> (/me watches as people turn around their arguments and start claiming it
> isn't a dependent action after all.)

It /is/ a dependent action without objections, just with a restriction
on who can object (per Rule 2124, paragraph 2, sentence 2, but currently
ineffective because "as if the contract was a rule" was repealed).

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

ais523 wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:49 +0100, ais523 wrote:
>> For each public contract (see the list at
>> <http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/system:page-tags/tag/public>), I
>> intend, without objection; I intend, without member objection; and I
>> intend, without 3 objections; to replace its entire text with the
>> following:
>> {{{
[scam text]
>> }}}
> Without member objection, I hereby amend the Fantasy Rules Context to
> the text shown within the {{{ }}} marks in the quote above. (Note: if
> the reasoning shown is incorrect, and I think it possibly is, this quite
> possibly fails.)

========================================================================