Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2768 =================== CFJ 2768 (Interest Index = 0) ==================== The IBA is a person. ======================================================================== Caller: Yally Judge: G. Judgement: UNDETERMINED Appeal: 2768a Decision: REASSIGN Judge: coppro Judgement: FALSE ======================================================================== History: Called by Yally: 27 Feb 2010 00:17:48 GMT Assigned to G.: 27 Feb 2010 17:05:40 GMT Judged UNDETERMINED by G.: 01 Mar 2010 16:23:36 GMT Appealed by comex: 02 Mar 2010 01:13:08 GMT Appealed by coppro: 02 Mar 2010 01:27:16 GMT Appealed by Yally: 02 Mar 2010 02:35:36 GMT Appeal 2768a: 02 Mar 2010 02:35:36 GMT REASSIGNED on Appeal: 06 Mar 2010 19:24:47 GMT Assigned to comex: 06 Mar 2010 20:11:51 GMT comex recused: 12 Mar 2010 17:23:07 GMT Assigned to coppro: 14 Mar 2010 09:04:16 GMT Judged FALSE by coppro: 21 Mar 2010 19:55:20 GMT ======================================================================== Judge G.'s Arguments: With absolutely no caller's arguments nor cite to the long case-law on personhood, or a single reference to events that may or may not have made this entity a person, the caller has not done even the merest preliminary level of reasonable homework to allow the judge to have a start on this case. UNDETERMINED. ======================================================================== Judge coppro's Arguments: CFJ 2768 is a simple case. Rule 2150 says "A person is an entity defined as such by rules with power of at least 2." There is no rule defining the IBA to be a person; therefore it s not one. ========================================================================