Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2796 =================== CFJ 2796 (Interest Index = 1) ==================== If the proposal entitled "Reassign the name" had AI 3 and passed, the Rulekeepor would be required to record a historical annotation to each rule. ======================================================================== Caller: comex Judge: coppro Judgement: FALSE ======================================================================== History: Called by comex: 08 May 2010 18:14:28 GMT Assigned to coppro: 11 May 2010 05:27:15 GMT Judged FALSE by coppro: 11 May 2010 06:02:31 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: Does a null-amendment count as a change? ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: Whenever a rule is changed in any way, the Rulekeepor SHALL record a historical annotation to the rule indicating: ======================================================================== Gratuitous Evidence by comex: On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Proposal: Reassign the name (AI=1.7, II=1, Distributable) >> {{{ >> Amend each rule in numerical order by replacing each instance of >> REASSIGN (case-sensitive) with REMIT. >> }}} >> >> -coppro > > I pay a fee to make this Distributable. > > I pay a fee to destroy one of my Rests. ======================================================================== Judge coppro's Arguments: Every English language definition of amend that I've found says that an amendment is a change. Therefore not changing a rule is not any amendment. Any further contradiction beyond this is defeated by Rule 105's anti-ambiguity clause, which causes the "null admenment" to fail. ========================================================================