Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2815a ================= Appeal 2815a (Interest Index = 0) ================== Panelist: Yally Decision: REMAND Panelist: G. Decision: OVERRULE/FALSE Panelist: Wooble Decision: OVERRULE/FALSE ======================================================================== History: Appeal initiated: 17 Jul 2010 05:22:32 GMT Assigned to Yally (panelist): 20 Jul 2010 13:48:06 GMT Assigned to G. (panelist): 20 Jul 2010 13:48:06 GMT Assigned to Wooble (panelist): 20 Jul 2010 13:48:06 GMT Wooble moves to OVERRULE/FALSE: 20 Jul 2010 15:04:06 GMT Yally moves to REMAND: 20 Jul 2010 15:41:02 GMT G. moves to OVERRULE/FALSE: 22 Jul 2010 08:46:02 GMT Final decision (OVERRULE/FALSE): 22 Jul 2010 08:46:02 GMT ======================================================================== Appellant Murphy's Arguments: Gah, thinko, I meant FALSE. I intend (with 2 support) to appeal this. ======================================================================== Panelist Wooble's Arguments: I opine OVERRULE - FALSE without prejudice. ======================================================================== Panelist Yally's Arguments: I opine REMAND without prejudice. I was considering overruling the judgment, but I have not actually investigated the matter myself and, should Murphy's subsequent arguments be faulty, I would not want to simply overrule the matter in such a way that no appeal is possible. ======================================================================== Panelist G.'s Arguments: If the judge's arguments ("see CFJ 2813") are accepted, this is a straightforward thinko as the judge stated when e appealed it. Since no one has raised or suggested controversy/appeal for CFJ 2813 and it is a clearly-written opinion, I opine OVERRULE - FALSE without prejudice. ========================================================================