Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3064 ============================== CFJ 3064 ============================== scshunt has cast two votes endorsing Murphy on Proposal 7086. ======================================================================== Caller: Murphy Judge: Tanner L. Swett Judgement: ======================================================================== History: Called by Murphy: 07 Jul 2011 01:56:29 GMT Assigned to scshunt: 07 Jul 2011 02:17:46 GMT scshunt recused: 07 Jul 2011 05:01:55 GMT Assigned to Tanner L. Swett: 24 Jul 2011 18:28:35 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: This depends on Rule 2280. The number of ballots is not explicitly specified. Does "e casts a number of ballots" apply to the ENDORSE part and the FOR part separately, or to the combination thereof? ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: scshunt wrote: > On 11-07-04 11:56 AM, omd wrote: >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible >> voters are the active first-class players at the time of this >> distribution, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the valid >> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). Then, >> I assign each listed proposal the ID number specified under "NUM". >> >> Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty. >> >> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE >> >> 7084 2 omd I see nothing wrong with letting one >> ...... imaginary person act on behalf of another >> ...... imaginary person > FORx2 >> 7085 1 Tanner L. Swett Horizontal rules > FORx1, AGAINSTx1 >> 7086 3 G., etc. Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery > ENDORSE Murphy, FOR (jig-jig-jeroo) ========================================================================