Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3085 ============================== CFJ 3085 ============================== The repair shop mentioned in the evidence violated Rule 101(v) by detaining Roujo's laptop ======================================================================== Caller: Bucky Judge: Murphy Judgement: FALSE ======================================================================== History: Called by Bucky: 07 Aug 2011 20:09:39 GMT Assigned to Murphy: 08 Aug 2011 15:52:53 GMT Judged FALSE by Murphy: 14 Aug 2011 17:38:39 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: From: Jonathan Rouillard To: "agora-business@agoranomic.org" Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 4:11 PM Subject: BUS: Yay! My laptop is back! If there is any pending intention to make me inactive, I object to it. I just got my laptop back from the repair shop, so I'm back in the game! =) ~ Roujo ======================================================================== Gratuitous Arguments by Roujo: I still followed the game from my Android phone, it was just a lot more difficult to do so. ======================================================================== Gratuitous Arguments by Tanner L. Swett: given the nature of a repair shop, it is likely that Roujo surrendered eir laptop voluntarily. However, the repair shop may have failed to repair the laptop in a timely fashion (on purpose or not), or, having repaired the laptop, they could have failed to return it in a timely fashion. Whether or not one of these would have violated Roujo's rights (had e not been able to participate in the fora via eir phone) is an open question. ======================================================================== Gratuitous Arguments by Roujo: The repair and return was timely. ========================================================================