Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3094 ========================= Criminal Case 3094 ========================= Murphy violated the 1-Power Rule 2168 by failing to initiate a humiliating public reminder that the voting period for Proposal 7105 was extended. ======================================================================== Caller: scshunt Barred: Murphy Judge: Pavitra Judgement: NOT GUILTY ======================================================================== History: Called by scshunt: 13 Aug 2011 23:53:24 GMT Defendant Murphy informed: 13 Aug 2011 23:53:24 GMT Assigned to Tanner L. Swett: 14 Aug 2011 17:54:14 GMT Tanner L. Swett recused: 10 Sep 2011 17:10:01 GMT Assigned to Pavitra: 10 Sep 2011 19:01:13 GMT Judged NOT GUILTY by Pavitra: 10 Sep 2011 19:31:15 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: I request the judge consider that I cannot recall Murphy ever issuing a humiliating reminder and that intiating ======================================================================== Gratuitous Arguments by Murphy: I used to issue them more often (search for subject "Shame!" in the a-b 2010 archives). ======================================================================== Judge Pavitra's Arguments: Since Proposals 7102-7105 belonged to a single distribution, if Murphy had fulfilled eir duty to issue humiliating public reminders for those proposals, e would almost certainly have done so in a single message, and likely in a single sentence (along the lines of "such-and-such players have not voted on Proposals 7102-7106"). I consider the nonpublication of that message to be substantially a single act. Thus, judgement has already been reached in another criminal case (CFJ 3091) with the same Accused, the same rule, and substantially the same alleged act. I judge CFJs 3092-3095 NOT GUILTY. ========================================================================