Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3120

==============================  CFJ 3120  ==============================

    ais523 violated a SHOULD requirement in rule 2205 by submitting
    this CFJ.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 ais523

Judge:                                  woggle
Judgement:                              FALSE

========================================================================

History:

Called by ais523:                       06 Nov 2011 20:44:14 GMT
Assigned to Yally:                      10 Nov 2011 16:23:12 GMT
Yally recused:                          20 Nov 2011 22:36:53 GMT
Assigned to woggle:                     20 Nov 2011 23:10:06 GMT
Judged FALSE by woggle:                 22 Nov 2011 05:49:29 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

[CotC: arguments and evidence are arranged as originally presented]

Evidence: What should be the arguments are labelled as evidence, and
vice versa.

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

Arguments: The above evidence.

========================================================================

Judge woggle's Arguments:

I judge CFJ 3120 FALSE. It seems that ais523 considered "the full
implications of failing to" label arguments and evidence correctly. If
not, then the definition of "SHOULD" does not create any requirements to
violate.

========================================================================