Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3124

==============================  CFJ 3124  ==============================

    The text labelled in this message as a Victory Announcement is a
    factually-correct Victory Announcement.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 G.
Barred:                                 Bucky

Judge:                                  omd
Judgement:                              TRUE

Judge:                                  omd
Judgement:                              FALSE

========================================================================

History:

Called by G.:                           07 Nov 2011 14:41:19 GMT
Assigned to Yally:                      10 Nov 2011 16:38:45 GMT
Yally recused:                          20 Nov 2011 22:36:53 GMT
Assigned to Walker:                     20 Nov 2011 23:12:18 GMT
Walker recused:                         04 Dec 2011 17:33:19 GMT
Assigned to Machiavelli:                04 Dec 2011 17:34:42 GMT
Machiavelli recused:                    08 Dec 2011 20:05:27 GMT
Assigned to omd:                        10 Dec 2011 22:49:51 GMT
Judged TRUE by omd:                     12 Dec 2011 07:36:09 GMT
Reconsideration requested by G.:        13 Dec 2011 20:33:59 GMT
Reconsideration requested by Murphy:    13 Dec 2011 20:37:53 GMT
Reconsideration requested by omd:       13 Dec 2011 20:37:53 GMT
Assigned to omd:                        13 Dec 2011 20:37:53 GMT
Judged FALSE by omd:                    13 Dec 2011 20:37:53 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

Not a "rules-defined victory condition" at the time that Proposal 7129 took 
effect.  Note that the author of R2343/3 was very very explicit at limiting
victory conditions to rules-defined ones as the result of a recent scam, so
the intent of this new rule text should be considered.

Proposal 7129 passed before R2343/3 took effect (in Proposal 7135) and 
victory conditions did not have to be rules defined in R2343/2.  So a likely

interpretation is that the win was quite valid and a Victory Condition was
achieved but no Victory Announcement is currently possible.

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

> ID: 7129
> Title: Why did we repeal that victory condition?
> Author: scshunt
> AI: 1.0
> Text:
> 
> Bucky satisfies the Victory Condition of Paradox.

VICTORY ANNOUNCEMENT:  Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Paradox.

Rule 2343/3 (Power=1.7)
Victory Conditions [excerpt]
       A Victory Condition is a condition explicitly defined by the
       rules as a victory condition.  A Victory Announcement is a
       published statement labeled as a Victory Announcement that
       states clearly that a specified person or persons have satisfied
       a specified and rules-defined victory condition (and explicitly
       and clearly states which persons and which victory condition).
       A Victory Announcement is self-ratifying.

========================================================================

Judge omd's Arguments:

I concur with the caller's argument.  TRUE.  (However, Bucky currently
satisfies the newly enacted Victory Condition of Paradox, so an
identical Victory Announcement posted now would be factually correct
and allow em to finally receive eir win.)

========================================================================

Request for reconsideration by G.:

I intend to motion to reconsider with 2 support.  The caller's arguments
(mine) were generally for FALSE; I can't tell here if the judge TRUED
when e meant to FALSE or whether e was reading the caller's arguments
as being supporting of TRUE.

========================================================================

Request for reconsideration by omd:

Oops, I meant FALSE.  I support and do so, and judge FALSE.

========================================================================

Judge omd's Arguments:

Oops, I meant FALSE.  I support and do so, and judge FALSE.

========================================================================