Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3138

==============================  CFJ 3138  ==============================

    A Promise titled "I want blood!" exists.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 Pavitra

Judge:                                  G.
Judgement:                              

========================================================================

History:

Called by Pavitra:                      28 Dec 2011 06:58:12 GMT
Assigned to G.:                         14 Jan 2012 20:15:51 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

Does the Holiday extend the period for collecting Objections?
I think it doesn't, because 1728(a) is worded in terms of relative
durations measured backward from the time of the attempted resolution,
rather than forward from the time of initiation.

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

On 12/27/2011 04:51 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Having received no objections, I do so.
> 
> On 12/20/2011 04:23 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> For each Promise quoted below, I intend without objection to destroy
>> that Promise.
>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Quantity: 2
>>> Title: I want blood!
>>> Author: scshunt
>>> Owner: Tree
>>> Cashing:
>>> A proposal has been adopted which imposes a penalty or makes it
>>> illegal for players to fail to vote on a distribution since the
>>> publication of this promise, and the cashier was its author.
>>>
>>> Text: I transfer 5 points to the cashier.
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Title: Vote Issue Series G1
>>> Author: G.
>>> Owner: Tree
>>> Copies: 5
>>> Cashing:
>>> The casher of this promise transfers 3 points to G. in the message in
>>> which e cashes this promise.
>>>
>>> Text:
>>> I vote X on Y, where Y is a decision currently in its voting period,
>>> and X is a valid option for said decision, and both X and Y are
>>> specified in the context sent with this message.
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Title: G1 vote guarantee
>>> Author: G.
>>> Owner: Tree
>>> Copies: 5
>>> Cashing:
>>> The casher of this message had previously cashed a promise of Vote Issue
>>> Series G1, and G. emself (outside the cashing of another promise)
>>> changed eir vote on the specified decision, and the casher has not
>>> cashed a different G1 Vote guarantee for that decision.
>>>
>>> Text: I transfer 6 points to the casher of this promise.
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Title: (2011-04-25 scshunt 2)
>>> Author: scshunt
>>> Owner: Tree
>>> Cashing:
>>> The entity cashing this promise, in the same message as e cashes it,
>>> transfers me 10 points and either transfers me an additional 30 points
>>> and destroys this promise, or else transfers it to the Tree.
>>>
>>> Destruction: This promise is not destroyed upon cashing.
>>> Text:
>>> Let N be the number of the specified proposal.
>>>
>>> I retract any votes on the Proposal N and vote to ENDORSE the player
>>> cashing this promise.
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

========================================================================

Gratuitous Arguments by G.:

A scam, based on the holiday timing of dependent actions using a 
similar version of R1728 wording, was sorted out by CFJ 2321, which 
may or may not contain relevant arguments.

========================================================================