From: <magika@aracnet.com>
To: agora-off <agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: OFF: CFJ 1182 Judged TRUE
Date: Thursday, November 25, 1999 2:18 AM



======================================================================
                              CFJ 1182

      All of these Private Orders were improperly executed:
    * Payment Order PO0018 for 0.1 Indulgence from me to Palnatoke
      Message-ID: <005601bf2b2b$46d02f20$35d652c3@opus>
    * t's Order for me to give em one of my Kudos
      Message-ID:
      <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911020015420.25836-100000@itu.st.jyu.fi>
    * harvel's Order for me to vacate Payment Order PO0006 for 0.1
      Indulgence from em to me
      Message-Id: <199910311223.HAA21045@msuacad.morehead-st.edu>

======================================================================

Called by:           Murphy

Judge:               t
Judgement:           TRUE

Judge selection:

Eligible:            t, Wes

Not eligible:
Caller:              Murphy
Barred:              -
Had their turn:      Blob, Chuck, Crito, Elysion, harvel, Kolja,
                     Lee, Michael, Murphy, Palnatoke, Peekee
Already served:      -
Defaulted:           -
By request:          Kolja
On Hold:             elJefe, Steve

======================================================================

History:

Called by Murphy:                     23 Nov 1999 02:36:50 -0800
Assigned to t:                        23 Nov 1999 23:31:03 -0800
Judged TRUE by t:                     24 Nov 1999 15:47:19 +0200
Judgement Distributed:                As of this message

=====================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

<none>

======================================================================

Evidence attached by the Caller:

<none>

======================================================================

Judge's Arguments:

I follow the same logic as in cfj 1172:

>>======================================================================
>>                              CFJ 1172
>>
>>    The Private Orders issued by Murphy in the message with subject
>>    "BUS: Agoran Weekly Journal" dated Sun, 31 Oct 1999 were
>>    improperly executed.
>>
>>======================================================================
>
>Assuming I am still judge of this, I Judge this TRUE.
>
>R&A:
>I am inclined to find private orders to be improper unless there is
>positive evidence that they are proper (for example, I might consider
>a private order made in accordance with a private agreement to be
>proper).  Since I have seen no such evidence, I believe the orders
>were improper.
>
>Chuck

======================================================================