==============================  CFJ 1891  ==============================

    If the Speaker fails to assign prerogatives for the upcoming month
    in the seven days before the beginning of a month, e CAN assign
    prerogatives (for that month) after the month has begun.


Caller:                                 G.

Judge:                                  omd

Judge:                                  OscarMeyr
Judgement:                              TRUE

Appeal:                                 1891a
Decision:                               REMAND

Judge:                                  OscarMeyr

Judge:                                  Wooble
Judgement:                              FALSE



Called by G.:                           02 Feb 2008 00:16:00 GMT
Assigned to omd:                        02 Feb 2008 04:46:32 GMT
omd recused:                            14 Feb 2008 22:29:35 GMT
Assigned to OscarMeyr:                  15 Feb 2008 18:45:05 GMT
Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr:               22 Feb 2008 01:37:07 GMT
Appealed by omd:                        22 Feb 2008 06:00:10 GMT
Appealed by root:                       22 Feb 2008 06:08:08 GMT
Appealed by Zefram:                     22 Feb 2008 10:08:39 GMT
Appeal 1891a:                           23 Feb 2008 06:06:39 GMT
REMANDED on Appeal:                     19 Apr 2008 11:57:21 GMT
Assigned to OscarMeyr:                  19 Apr 2008 11:57:21 GMT
OscarMeyr recused:                      28 Apr 2008 06:00:33 GMT
Assigned to Wooble:                     28 Apr 2008 06:02:58 GMT
Judged FALSE by Wooble:                 01 May 2008 13:08:55 GMT


Caller's Arguments:

Rule 2019 requires the Speaker to make assignments by using the
term SHALL (R2152).  Question 1 comes down to whether SHALL empowers
the act to be performed by announcement or any other method, or
merely requires without empowering.  The time limit is specified by
R1023(a) by "timely fashion".

Question 2 (trivially FALSE if Question 1 is FALSE) is, if the
Speaker is empowered to so assign "in a timely fashion before", does
the SHALL continue to empower em after the time limit has expired?


Judge OscarMeyr's Arguments:

In general, SHALL and CAN do not automatically imply a time
constraint to the ability to perform the action in question; such a
limitation must be produced by other language in the Rules.  R2019
requires the action of assigning prerogatives to be performed within
a specified time range, but does not prevent the assignment if it is
made late.  I rule TRUE.


Appellant omd's Arguments:

See root's message in a-d, among other things.


Judge Wooble's Arguments:

Rule 2019/13 provided no mechanism by which the Speaker could assign
Prerogatives, and the court finds no precedent for taking SHALL to
imply CAN when no mechanism is given in the Rules.  Additionally, an
inspection of the use of SHALL in the current ruleset shows no other
case where such an implication would be required to allow a player to
take some action required by the rules; in every other case such a
mechanism is explicitly provided if necessary.