==============================  CFJ 2495  ==============================

    Murphy published at least one on-time judgement in the below-quoted
    message.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 omd

Judge:                                  Tiger
Judgement:                              TRUE

========================================================================

History:

Called by omd:                          04 May 2009 23:08:57 GMT
Assigned to Tiger:                      05 May 2009 03:02:44 GMT
Judged TRUE by Tiger:                   05 May 2009 19:00:59 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2490
>
> ==============================  CFJ 2490  ==============================
>
>    root has a rest.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller:                                 root
>
> Judge:                                  comex
> Judgement:                              TRUE
>
> ========================================================================
>
> History:
>
> Called by root:                         04 May 2009 21:13:38 GMT
> Assigned to comex:                      04 May 2009 22:14:36 GMT
> Judged TRUE by comex:                   04 May 2009 22:37:06 GMT
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller's Arguments:
>
> root had no rests, then announced "I create a rest," but did not
> explicitly declare into whose possession the rest was created.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Judge comex's Arguments:
>
> TRUE: "I create a rest" is suitably unambiguous because root could
> only possibly have meant to create it in eir own possession: no other
> methods of creating rests by announcement are defined in the rules.
> However, "I spend C C to destroy a rest" would be ambiguous even if
> the intended target is fairly obvious.
>
> ========================================================================

========================================================================

Judge Tiger's Arguments:

I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public forum.

========================================================================