==============================  CFJ 2668  ==============================

    If I resolved the first quoted intent, a player who had given notice
    both 6 and 60 days previously would be able to join ə.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 scshunt

Judge:                                  Walker
Judgement:                              TRUE

========================================================================

History:

Called by scshunt:                      23 Aug 2009 01:25:45 GMT
Assigned to Walker:                     27 Aug 2009 14:56:13 GMT
Judged TRUE by Walker:                  28 Aug 2009 11:22:21 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

the contract is Legalistic and so should be interpreted by
its text.

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend, without objection from any party to ə in the next 24 hours, to
> act on behalf of ə to amend it by appending "A player may not join ə
> without giving at least 4 days and at most 2 weeks notice of their intent."
>
> I intend, without objection from any party to ə in the next 24 hours, to
> act on behalf of ə to amend it by replacing "A party to this contract
> can act on its behalf" with "A party to this contract can act on its
> behalf or cause it to act".
>
> The former is to prevent players from swooping in to object to ə
> actions, the latter is to make clearly valid a mistake I just realized
> I've been making.

========================================================================

Judge Walker's Arguments:

Trivially TRUE. As coppro noted, the contract is Legalistic and should
be interpreted by its text, and eir intended amendment only states
that "a player may not [...]", not cannot, join ə without giving
intent.

========================================================================