============================== CFJ 3111 ============================== The documents "Victory Condition of Being Bucky" and "Victory Condition of Being Pavitra" either are Victory Conditions or define specific Victory Conditions. ======================================================================== Caller: Bucky Judge: omd Judgement: FALSE ======================================================================== History: Called by Bucky: 23 Oct 2011 18:13:33 GMT Assigned to omd: 23 Oct 2011 19:46:09 GMT Judged FALSE by omd: 23 Oct 2011 22:04:06 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Arguments: The Herald is required to track information related to Victory Cases but is not required to track Victory Conditions. As such, the creation of new Victory Conditions is not regulated, and by 101 (i) I am not forbidden from doing so. I didn't necessarily have to publish it once created, but doing so provides the judges of assorted CfJs with the information they need to make an informed judgment. ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: On 10/23/2011 12:05 PM, John Smith wrote: > I publish the following document, "Victory Condition of Being Bucky": > {{ > The entity in question has sent a message to a public forum from the email address "spambait3@yahoo.com". > > }} > > I initiate a CfJ on the statement "Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Being Bucky" > > Evidence: The document published above, the header of this message. Gratuitous on the quoted CFJ: if this worked, it would modify information for which the Herald is required to be a recordkeepor. Therefore, defining Victory Conditions is regulated. However, this scam might work if the office of Herald is vacant, so that no player is required to fulfill the office's duties. I assume Herald. I resign Herald. I publish the following document, "Victory Condition of Being Pavitra": {{ The entity in question has sent a message to a public forum from the email address "celestialcognition@gmail.com". }} ======================================================================== Judge omd's Arguments: [CotC: see CFJ 3109] ========================================================================