============================== CFJ 3263 ============================== I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Bar) ======================================================================== Caller: Machiavelli Judge: ais523 Judgement: Judge: FKA441344 Judgement: TRUE ======================================================================== History: Called by Machiavelli: 30 Aug 2012 00:20:40 GMT Assigned to ais523: 30 Aug 2012 19:23:41 GMT ais523 recused: 08 Sep 2012 21:00:06 GMT Assigned to FKA441344: 17 Sep 2012 14:14:29 GMT Judged TRUE by FKA441344: 30 Sep 2012 22:30:41 GMT ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: [CotC: The initiating message specified UTF-8. E280AE is Unicode RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE, E280AC is POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING. The numbering of these CFJs does not necessarily match the order in which they were created.] Define the word "=E2=80=AEooF=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the word "=E2=80=AEraB=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)".}. =E2=80=AEraB ooF The answers are obvious, right? The first one is FALSE, and the second one is TRUE. Oh, and for good measure, I call a CFJ on the statement "I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz)". ======================================================================== Judge FKA441344's Arguments: The email's headers indicate that it should be interpreted as UTF-8, and when it is so interpreted the Foo comes before the Bar. ========================================================================