============================== CFJ 3263 ==============================
I have already called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)
========================================================================
Caller: Machiavelli
Judge: ais523
Judgement:
Judge: FKA441344
Judgement: TRUE
========================================================================
History:
Called by Machiavelli: 30 Aug 2012 00:20:40 GMT
Assigned to ais523: 30 Aug 2012 19:23:41 GMT
ais523 recused: 08 Sep 2012 21:00:06 GMT
Assigned to FKA441344: 17 Sep 2012 14:14:29 GMT
Judged TRUE by FKA441344: 30 Sep 2012 22:30:41 GMT
========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
[CotC: The initiating message specified UTF-8. E280AE is Unicode
RIGHT-TO-LEFT OVERRIDE, E280AC is POP DIRECTIONAL FORMATTING. The
numbering of these CFJs does not necessarily match the order in which
they were created.]
Define the word "=E2=80=AEooF=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the
statement "I
have already called a CFJ in this message. (Foo)".}, and define the
word "=E2=80=AEraB=E2=80=AC" as meaning {I call a CFJ on the statement "I have
already
called a CFJ in this message. (Bar)".}.
=E2=80=AEraB ooF
The answers are obvious, right? The first one is FALSE, and the second
one is TRUE.
Oh, and for good measure, I call a CFJ on the statement "I have
already called a CFJ in this message. (Plaz)".
========================================================================
Judge FKA441344's Arguments:
The email's headers indicate that it should be interpreted as UTF-8,
and when it is so interpreted the Foo comes before the Bar.
========================================================================