==============================  CFJ 3419  ==============================

    If Rule 1789 were repealed, the obligation on the Registrar to note
    the method of deregistration of players deregistered by Writ of FAGE
    would remain.

========================================================================

Called by scshunt:                                  19 Jun 2014 23:59:36
Assigned to Henri:                                  30 Jun 2014 13:44:22

========================================================================

<CAMQXVwXLPBXmHvrTHfr+eBfnyX_34nbsz=DpFg6f+s=+4p-BZg@mail.gmail.com>
Exhibit by scshunt:

The wording of the rule implies that the rule instantaneously creates an
ongoing obligation, rather than continuously creating an instantaneous
obligation. Can such an obligation persist beyond the rule's expiry?

========================================================================

<alpine.DEB.2.02.1407010010390.9872@sprocket.nvg.ntnu.no>
Exhibit by Ørjan:

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> CFJ 3419 (scshunt): "If Rule 1789 were repealed, the obligation on the
> Registrar to note the method of deregistration of players deregistered
> by Writ of FAGE would remain."
>
> is hereby assigned to Henri.
And I'd have thought that would go to Murphy again?
Greetings,
Ørjan.

========================================================================